Moisés el egipcio

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute...

Qu'il prenne la forme de la citation, du plagiat ou de la récupération, le remploi est une pratique culturelle essentielle pour comprendre ce qu'il est convenu d'appeler la «& Renaissance du XIIe siècle& » et, plus généralement, la culture des XIe-XIIIe siècles. Dans le domaine littéraire, il s'agit de déterminer les modes - explicites ou implicites - de la réinsertion d'éléments significatifs perçus comme anciens, dans une dialectique subtile entre l'«& ancien& », le «& nouveau& » et l'ancien rénové. Il en va de même en histoire où, depuis le XIe siècle, les termes de...

NSAMBIA MPUNGO DIOS EN LA CREENCIA CUBANA DEL PALO MONTE MAYOMBE. En este es­tudio sobre la no posición de Dios en el sistema religioso se ha empleado como ejemplo explicativo el juego del ábaco. Se ha comprobado como muchos “kutuguango” narran la ruptura de un orden armónico originario con el consiguiente a­lejamiento de Dios; y, desde entonces, los espíritus sirven para “coser” este desgarramiento. De este modo, a través de la relación con los espíritus, toda la realidad será interpretada y el problema del mal encontrará un lenguaje. Si hay desgracia es porque ha habido...

In the sixteenth century, in the eyes of the ruling class, land, arable land, remained the basis of all prosperity. As the dignitary rose in rank, he acquired the rights to more and larger areas of real estate. Theoretically, nobody was the owner of the land. The land belonged to the collective owner, calpulli, to public institutions such as temples, or to the city itself. There was no private ownership of the land, there was collective ownership with individual right of use.